Currently most Mormon apologists do not place much emphasis on archaeological evidences (and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints officially places none) for at least the following reasons:
Some of the archaeological problems for the Book of Mormon centre round the descriptions of activity that is supposed to have taken place in Central and South America, but for which almost no archaeological evidence has been found. For example the Book of Mormon describes the use of brass, steel, gold and silver coins, silk and linen. It describes the presence of sheep, cattle, oxen and elephants, the use of chariots and horses. Barley and wheat agriculture are descibed, as are grapes and olives. All of the aforementioned were unknown in South America according to the vast majority of current research.
Only a small percentage of known archeological sites in the Americas have been fairly excavated. While there is a great deal of archeological data (as well as historic accounts) of ancient Aztec city of Tenochtitlan over which Mexico City was been built, many other ancient cities of the Americas have had little serious excavation done on them. (Brigham Young University has sponsored a number of archeological excavations in Mesoamerica and apologetic researchers continue work on several fronts.
Much of the literature of the Pre-Columbian Maya was deliberately destroyed by the Spanish when they conquered the region in the 1500s. On this point, a prominent Mesoamerican archaeologist, Michael Coe of Yale University noted:
The Book of Mormon affirms that there were pre-Columbian peoples that were literate, spoke knowledge of Old World languages, and possessed Old World derived writing systems. (E.g. 1 Nephi 13:23 et. seq.) They smelted metal and made tools and weapons of iron, steel, and brass. (E.g. Ether 7:9, 10:23) They owned domesticated horses and cattle. They possessed chariots. (E.g. Alma 18:9-12) The people covered the entire land. These archeological implications and scores of others found in the Book of Mormon, if true, predict that certain discoveries will be made in the pre-Columbian archaeological record. But critics assert that no such discovery has yet been made, and that some of what is currently known contradicts Book of Mormon claims.
See also:
View of Mormon Apologists
Archaeological problems for the Book of Mormon
State of Archeological Research
Thirty years ago, Michael Coe said "As far as I know there is not [in 1973] one professionally trained archaeologist, who is not a Mormon, who sees any scientific justification for believing [the historicity of The Book of Mormon], and I would like to state that there are quite a few Mormon archaeologists who join this group." ("Mormons and Archaeology: An Outside View," in Dialogue, A Journal of Mormon Thought, Vol 8, No 2, (Summer 1973), p. 42.) In the intervening thirty years apologetic researchers have presented a large body of new strikingly plausible parallels between the Book of Mormon text and the dirt record that have received little attention from critics.
Despite the current state of archeological knowledge in the Americas, each archeological discovery brings probative value regarding the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. Interested parties await to see what future archaeological evidence reveals regarding the existence of such objects as horses, metallurgical objects (swords), or the names of places in ancient America referred to in the Book of Mormon.State of Archeological Research
Only a small percentage of known archeological sites in the Americas have been fairly excavated. While there is a great deal of archeological data (as well as historic accounts) of ancient Aztec city of Tenochtitlan over which Mexico City was been built, many other ancient cities of the Americas have had little serious excavation done on them. (Brigham Young University has sponsored a number of archeological excavations in Mesoamerica.) Although much more is certainly yet to be uncovered, archaeology has provided a large amount of data on the lives, customs, technology, etc. of the ancient American peoples. A prominent Mesoamerican archaeologist, Michael Coe of Yale University, addressed the state of Mesoamerican archeology in regards to The Book of Mormon in 1973:
The Book of Mormon affirms that there were pre-Columbian peoples that were literate, spoke knowledge of Old World languages, and possessed Old World derived writing systems. (E.g. 1 Nephi 13:23 et. seq.) They smelted metal and made tools and weapons of iron, steel, and brass. (E.g. Ether 7:9, 10:23) They owned domesticated horses and cattle. They possessed chariots. (E.g. Alma 18:9-12) The people covered the entire land. These archeological implications and scores of others found in the Book of Mormon, if true, predict that certain discoveries will be made in the pre-Columbian archaeological record. But critics assert that no such discovery has yet been made, and that some of what is currently known contradicts Book of Mormon claims.
See also:
The ancient Mesoamerican legend of Quetzalcoatl, according to some versions as "the bearded white god", is interpreted by some Latter-day Saint apologists as an altered depiction of the actual visit of Jesus Christ to the Americas referred to in the Book of Mormon. Most students of ancient Mesoamerica do not accept this claim, for at least two of the following reasons: Quetzalcoatl the Feathered Serpent deity is depicted in Mesoamerican art several centuries before Jesus. The King Quetzalcoatl who promised to return to Mexico dated almost 1,000 years after the life of Jesus. [1]. Apologists rebut that the visitation of Jesus was incorporated into some of the various, exisiting legends of Quetzalcoatl.
See also:
As with other potential sources of evidence, data on comparisons of genetic markers in the DNA of different races is in its infancy. Recent evidence on whether some native americans are genetically linked to old world races currently indicates that most genetic traits and genes of modern Jews are not found in Native Americans, although some mitochondrial DNA analysis shows that others are found in both Israel and Native Americans
The most controversial of these studies was published in the late 2002 by anthropologist Thomas W. Murphy. This subject is currently under extensive discussion. Also see Lamanites.
External Links:
(Pro) " class="external">http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/DNA.shtml
(Neutral)" class="external">http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_migr1.htm
(Con)http://www.ericbarger.com/mormon.dna.htmThe Bat Creek Cave Stone
Genetic studies
Another controversial issue is whether there is DNA evidence that modern American Indians are descendants of the Hebrews as implied by the Book of Mormon.