Table of contents |
2 The formula 3 Extensions of the formula 4 Formula derivation 5 Black-Scholes in practice 6 See also 7 External links and references |
The key assumptions of the Black-Scholes model are:
The above lead to the following formula for the price of a call on a stock currently trading at price S, where the option has an exercise price of K, i.e. the right to buy a share at price K, at T years in the future. The constant interest rate is r and the constant stock volatility is v:
The model
The formula
where
The price of a put option may be computed from this by put-call parity and simplifies to:
The above option pricing formula is used for pricing European put and call options on non-dividend paying stocks. The Black-Scholes model may be easily extended to options on instruments paying dividends. For options on indexes (such as the FTSE) where each of 100 constituent companies may pay a dividend twice a year and so there is a payment nearly every business day, it is reasonable to assume that the dividends are paid continuously. The dividend payment paid over the time period is then modelled as
Exactly the same formula is used to price options on foreign exchange rates, except now q plays the role of the foreign risk-free interest rate and S is the spot exchange rate. This is the Garman-Kohlhagen model (1983).
It is also possible to extend the Black-Scholes framework to options on instruments paying discrete dividends. This is useful when the option is struck on a single stock. A typical model is to assume that a proportion of the stock price is paid out at pre-determined times . The price of a stock is then modelled as
American options are more difficult to value, and a choice of models is available (for example Whaley, binomial options model).
1) The Black-Scholes PDE
In this section we derive the partial differential equation (PDE) at the heart of the Black-Scholes model via a no-arbitrage or delta-hedging argument. The presentation given here is informal and we do not worry about the validity of moving between dt meaning an small increment in time and dt as a derivative.
As in the model assumptions above we assume that the underlying (typically the stock) follows a geometric Brownian motion. That is,
2) From the general Black-Scholes PDE to a specific valuation
We now show how to get from the general Black-Scholes PDE to a specific valuation for this option. Consider as an example the Black-Scholes price of a call on a stock currently trading at price S. The option has an exercise price of K, i.e. the right to buy a share at price K, at T years in the future. The constant interest rate is r and the constant stock volatility is v(all as at top).
Now, for a call option the PDE above has boundary conditions:
Extensions of the formula
for some constant q. Under this formulation the arbitrage-free price under the Black-Scholes model can be shown to be
where now
is the modified forward price that occurs in the terms.
where n(t) is the number of dividends that have been paid at time t. The price of a call option on a such stock is again
where now
is the forward price for the dividend paying stock.Formula derivation
where W Brownian. Now let V be some sort of option on S - mathematically V is a function of S and t. By Ito's Lemma for two variables we have
Now consider a portfolio consisting of one unit of the option V and -dV/dS units of the underlying. The composition of this portfolio, called the delta-hedge portfolio, will vary from time-step to time-step. Now consider the change in value
of the portfolio by subbing in the equation above:
This equation contains no term. That is, it is entirely riskless. Thus, assuming no arbitrage (and also no transaction costs and infinite supply and demand) the rate of return on this portfolio must be equal to the rate of return on any other riskless instrument. Now assuming the risk-free rate of return is we must have over the time period
If we now substitute in for and divide through by we obtain the Black-Scholes PDE
With the assumptions of the Black-Scholes model, this equation holds whenever V has two derivatives with respect to S and one with respect to t.
In order to solve the PDE we transform the equation into a standard diffusion equation which may be solved using standard methods. To this end set
Substituting v for u and the V for v, we finally obtain the value of a call option in terms of the Black-Scholes parameters:
3) Other derivations
Above we used the method of arbitrage-free pricing ("delta-hedging") to derive a PDE governing option prices given the Black-Scholes model. It is also possible to use a risk neutrality argument. This latter method gives the price as the expectation of the option payoff under a particular probability measure, called the risk-neutral measure, which differs from the real world measure.
The use of the Black-Scholes formula is pervasive in the markets. In fact the model has become such an integral part of market conventions that it is common practice for the implied volatility rather than the price of an instrument to be quoted. (All the parameters in the model other than the volatility - that is the time to expiry, the strike, the risk-free rate and current underlying price - are unequivocably observable. This means there is one-to-one relationship between the option price and the volatility.) Traders prefer to think in terms of volatility.
However, the Black-Scholes model can not be modelling the real world completely accurately. If the Black-Scholes model held, then the implied volatility of an option on a particular stock would be constant, even as the strike and maturity varied. In practice, the volatility surface (the two-dimensional graph of implied volatility against strike and maturity ) is not flat. In fact, in a typical market, the graph of strike against implied volatility for a fixed maturity is typically smile-shaped (see volatility smile). That is, at-the-money (the option for which the underlying price and strike co-incide) the implied volatility is lowest; out-of-the-money or in-the-money the implied volatility tends to be higher. The reason for this smile is still the subject of much speculation and research. A prominent proposed explanation is that the market in options away from the money is less liquid than at-the-money: traders demand a premium for these options because they know it may be more difficult to reverse an option position in illiquid markets. This view is consistent with the fact the smile was first observed shortly after the stock market crash of 1987. Before this crash, the first and most severe since the introduction of options, the Black-Scholes was more widely trusted.
See also
External links and references