Classical authorities of Babylonia and Assyria
Before the
decipherment of
cuneiform text, knowledge of the history of
Babylon and
Assyria was mostly dependent upon classical authorites. This history, however, was scanty and questionable. Had the native history of Berossus survived, this may not have been the case; all that is known of the Chaldaean historian's work, however, is derived from quotations in
Josephus,
Ptolemy,
Eusebius and
George Syncellus. The authenticity of his list of 10 antediluvian kings who reigned for 120 sari or 432,000 years, has been partially confirmed by the inscriptions; but his 8 postdiluvian dynasties are difficult to reconcile with the monuments, and the numbers attached to them are probably corrupt. It is different with the 7th and 8th dynasties as given by Ptolemy in his
Almagest, which prove to have been faithfully recorded:
- Nabonassar (747 BC) 14 years
- Nadios
- Khinziros and Poros (Pul)
- Ilulaeos
- Mardokempados (Merodach-Baladan) 12
- Arkeanos (Saigon)
- Interregnum
- Hagisa 1 month
- Belibos (702 BC) 3 years
- Assaranadios (Assur-nadin-sum)
- Rëgebelos- ..year
- Mesesimordakos . 4 years
- Interregnum
- Asaridinos (Esar-haddon) ....13..
- Saosdukhinos (Savu'l-sum-yukin) . . . . 20 ,,
- Sinëladanos (Assur-bani-pal) ....... 22 ,,
The account of Babylon given by
Herodotus is not that of aft eye-witness and not very extenesive. In his
Histories he mentions that he will devote a whole section to the history of Assyria, but this promise is unfufilled. Herodotus' views are argued against by
Ctesias, who, however, has mistaken mythology for history, and Greek romance owed to him its
Ninus and
Semiramis, its Ninyas and Sardanapalus. Another ancient authority of some value on Babylonian and Assyrian history, is the
Old Testament.
See also: Babylonia and Assyria
This article is based on content originally from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. Update as needed.