The term "Dodgy Dossier" was coined by journalists after Channel 4 News learnt that much of the work had been plagiarised from various uncredited sources, most notably from a postgraduate thesis published on the internet. Whole sections of Californian student Ibrahim al-Marashi's article on "Saddam's Special Security Organisation" were repeated verbatim (typographical errors included), with only minor propagandistic modifications - for example: "monitoring foreign embassies in Iraq" became "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq", and "aiding opposition groups in hostile regimes" became "supporting terrorist organisations in hostile regimes".
The report itself claims in its opening paragraph to draw "upon a number of sources, including intelligence reports". Ahead of the document's release it had been praised by Tony Blair and Colin Powell as further intelligence and quality research.
A day after Channel 4's allegations, Downing Street issued a statement, admitting a mistake was made in not crediting its sources, but that this error did not alter the quality of the report's content.
The claims of both the "September" and "Dodgy" dossiers were called into question during the 2003 war on Iraq, when Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) had failed to be used or found, and the dossiers were the subject of an enquiry by the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee. The Committee subsequently reported that the sources should have been credited, and that the dossier should have been checked by ministers before being released. As it was, the dossier had not been reviewed by anyone other than a group of civil servants operating under Alastair Campbell. The committee stated that the publication was "almost wholly counter-productive" and only served to undermine the credibility of the government's case for war.
Subsequently, the term "Dodgy Dossier" has stretched to cover both documents and the controversy surrounding them - most notably the argument between the government and the BBC over the claim in the September Dossier that Iraq could launch a WMD attack within 45 minutes and the controversy surrounding the death of Doctor David Kelly (see September Dossier for details).