Table of contents |
2 Significance for Brain Science 3 Further Reading 4 External links |
Gage's Injury
Phineas Gage was in 1848, working outside the small town of Cavendish, Vermont on the construction of a railroad track where he was employed as a foreman. One of his duties was to set explosive charges in holes drilled into large pieces of rock so they could be broken up and moved. This involved filling the hole with gunpowder, adding a fuse, and then packing in sand with a large tamping iron. Whilst Gage was momentarily distracted the tamping iron sparked against the rock and ignited the gunpowder causing it to be blown through Gage's head with such force that it landed almost thirty metres behind him.
The 4 foot long tamping iron entered his skull below his left cheek bone and exited after passing through the front part of the frontal lobes (specifially, the ventromedial areas of the prefrontal cortex). Remarkably after such a dramatic accident Gage was speaking within a few minutes and managed to sign off his time sheet and walk home, where he sat outside and waited for the doctor. After a seemingly complete recovery from such a serious injury, and due largely to the work of Dr. John Harlow, Gage was soon back at work.
However, whereas previously he had been hard working, responsible and popular with the men under his charge, his personality seemed to have been radically altered after his accident. Dr Harlow reported that:
Neurologist Antonio Damasio has written extensively on Gage, and various patients he has studied with similar brain injuries. He suggests a link between the frontal lobes, emotion and practical decision making, a theory he calls the 'somatic marker hypothesis'. Damasio sees Gage's case as crucial in the history of the brain sciences, arguing that Gage's story "was the historical beginnings of the study of the biological basis of behavior".
Significance for Brain Science
Gage's case was among the first evidence that damage to the frontal lobes could alter aspects of personality and affect socially appropriate interaction. Before this time the frontal lobes were largely thought to have little role in behaviour.Further Reading
External links