Its defenders state that the acknowledgement of this right is simply an acknowledgement of the status quo, and that denial of the right is meaningless unless one is able and willing to use military force to deny it. Furthermore, they note that granting such a right promotes peace, since it removes the justification for many wars by denying the legitimacy of violating the borders of a nation's de facto area of control.
Its critics respond that it rewards military aggression and thus may serve to promote rather than prevent war.
Modern-day examples where the right of conquest might be appealed to include Israel, Tibet, and mainland China.