Soundness
An
argument is
sound if, and only if, (1) the argument is
valid
and (2) all of its premises are
true.
So suppose we have a sound argument:
- All men are mortal.
- Socrates is a man.
- Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
In this case we have an argument where, first, if the premises are all true, then the conclusion must be true
(i.e., the argument is
valid);
and, second, it so happens that the premises
are all true.
It follows that the conclusion must be true.
That is the nice thing about soundness: if you
know an argument is sound, then you
know that its
conclusion is true.
By definition, all sound arguments have true conclusions.
So soundness is a very good quality for an argument to have.
In
mathematical logic, a formal deduction
calculus is said to be
sound with respect to a given logic (i.e. wrt its
semantics) if every statement that can be derived
within this calculus is a
tautology of the logic. Stated differently, this says that everything that can be formally (
syntactically) calculated is semantically true.
The reverse condition is called
completeness.