Chinese science strategists see Mainland China's greatest opportunities in newly emerging fields such as biotechnology and computers where there is still a chance for the PRC to become a significant player. Most Chinese students who went abroad have not returned, but they have built a dense network of transpacific contacts that will greatly facilitate U.S.-China scientific cooperation in coming years. The United States is often held up as the standard of modernity in the PRC. Indeed, photos of the Space Shuttle often appear in Chinese advertisements as a symbol of advanced technology. The PRC's small but growing space program, whose Shenzhou spacecraft had carried the first human taikonaut safely into space from PRC on October 15 2003, is a focus of national pride.
The U.S.-P.R.C. Science and Technology Agreement remains the framework for bilateral cooperation in this field. A 5-year agreement to extend the S&T Agreement was signed in April 2001. There are currently over 30 active protocols under the Agreement, covering cooperation in areas such as marine conservation, renewable energy, and health. Japan and the European Union also have high profile science and technology cooperative relationships with the People's Republic of China. Biennial Joint Commission Meetings on Science and Technology bring together policymakers from both sides to coordinate joint S&T cooperation. Executive Secretaries meetings are held each year to implement specific cooperation programs.
Much of the Western work in the history of science in China has been done by Joseph Needham. Among the scientific accomplishments of China were the invention of paper,
the compass, gunpowder, and the observation of supernova.
One question that has be the subject of debate among historians has been why China did not develop a scientific revolution and why Chinese technology fell behind that of Europe in the 19th century.
Many hypothesis have been proposed ranging from cultural to political to economic. John Fairbanks argued that the Chinese political system was hostile to scientific progress. More recent explanations have questioned political and cultural explanations and have focused on economic ones.
Examples of the latter include Benjamin Elman's high level equilibrium trap and Kenneth Pommeranz argument that resources from the New World were the crucial difference between European and Chinese development.
See also:
History of Science and Technology in China